News - Is The Ttk Warzone 2i Good. Slow Vs Fast Time To Kill
In this game. I don't find myself getting into those similar situations, because if I barge into a room where someone's hiding in there and the door's shut, they're obviously going to hear the door; they're going to turn around and start shooting at me, but the time to kill is slower if they're not very accurate with their shots and they don't hit all of them.
I could fight back. I have a chance to fight back and still kill them, so I'm not punished for rushing in there. I'm still slightly at a disadvantage, because yes, they are likely still going to get the first few shots on me, but it's not a guaranteed kill for them just because they were camping and advertising at a door.
That is why it works so well, and I don't hate doors anymore. I don't hate mounting either. I did not think this would happen, but it kind of did, and another thing that I kind of always knew but didn't really think about until now as well is spawns. I don't mind bad spawns as much when you have a slower time to kill because, again, if someone spawns behind you, they still have to be a decent player to kill you because if they miss their shots, then you now have a chance to turn around and fight back and actually win that gunfight.
Another thing that is, you know, not a good thing in this game is that, in my opinion, it's a mechanic. I wouldn't mind if it changed. Well, obviously, I want the spawns to be better. But in general, it doesn't ruin the game as much as it would in a game with a fast time to kill; there's just so many little things like that. I could even talk about map design, and just like the gunsmith and the balance There's so many things that are not as bad because of the Slow Time to Kill.
100 hp playlist
I will say that I do understand that people do have the preference of a fast time to kill, and that's completely fine. You are 100% allowed to have that preference, but I think it's really hard to argue otherwise.
To these points I made in this article, of course the skill gap is going to be higher and the overall game pacing is going to be faster when the time to kill is slower, but if you prefer that FAS time to kill for whatever reason. I heard some people say it's more satisfying, which I don't agree with, but if that's how you feel, that's how you feel.
I've heard people say you know they prefer the realism of it, which again, I don't really think makes a lot of sense for an arcade shooter, but you know again, that's what you prefer. That's 100% okay, which is why I am hoping that Sledgehammer addresses that and adds 100 HP. Playlist: for those players, they do have, of course, hardcore, but hardcore is 30 HP.
obviously these players they don't want that fast of A Time to Kill they just want like somewhat of a faster one and I understand that like I do get it I was the same way in Vanguard I really wanted a slow time to kill and they did add an overclocked mode that's what they called it in Vanguard, where it had slower time to kill unfortunately it was an LTM and wasn't always in the game but I really enjoyed that mode and it completely changed the game for me so I am hoping they add this as a permanent mode for people who want to play that mainly so we don't have to hear them complaining about it all year because I know that's going to happen and I'm really worried Sledgehammer is going to make a change I'm already hearing so many people online saying they prefer something like 125 HP or, just overall, a faster time to kill, and I really don't want to see that happen.
I really love how it currently is, and I think it plays wonderfully. And I have zero issues with it, so if S Hammer wants to, you know, appeal to those players, don't you know, completely change the core gameplay, just add in that separate playlist for those people, and if they want to play it, they can; if they don't, they can go back to Modern Warfare 2 or the fast time to kill.
You know, that's the only solution we really have here.
PREVIOUS Page
